RE: [nant-dev] new types + change ?

2004-10-31 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Aliger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 1 november 2004 7:53 > To: 'Gert Driesen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [nant-dev] new types + change ? > > > - Ant's element allows a reference to an existing > > definition to be specified us

RE: [nant-dev] new types + change ?

2004-10-31 Thread Martin Aliger
> - Ant's element allows a reference to an existing > definition to be specified using a "pathref" attribute > on , while we do not allow this. > > > > Is this something we should support ? I'd like to avoid > this, if its not really necessary. Isn't it the same as refid (as in