Re: [nant-dev] Regarding Bugs item #1503678

2006-07-17 Thread Ramya Niranjan
Folks,   Able to repro this bug. But wonder why this does not happen with RC3? Works like a chum there. Though I do not spot any code level change between rc3 and rc5 in the Unzip task CS file   Rgds, N  On 7/18/06, Ramya Niranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wonder how you create a zip file o

[nant-dev] Regarding Bugs item #1503678

2006-07-17 Thread Ramya Niranjan
I wonder how you create a zip file of 0 KB size? I tried but the minimum size of the zip file is 4 KB(I assume it adds the header information with the zip which bloats the size). - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-17 Thread Gary Feldman
Martin Aliger wrote: > Uhm. I'm not sure, I know what you are speaking about. You're refering to IM > (instant messaging) itself? The purpose of the miranda program is irrelevant > in my referal. I just like their web site layout, ideas and mainly addons > site. I think NAnt's task site should be s

[nant-dev] [ nant-Bugs-1523886 ] Reference to IE ActiveX in VBProj doesn't work

2006-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1523886, was opened at 2006-07-17 16:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=1523886&group_id=31650 Please note that this message will contain a full copy o

Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond

2006-07-17 Thread John Cole
Well, since we have been using .85 in production for well over a year now, I would agree that a release is in order. :-) However, I would like to see one thing, updated instructions for building the NAnt installation MSI. We use a MSI generated from last year (when the instructions for creating i

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-17 Thread Martin Aliger
> > I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See > http://www.miranda-im.org/ > > and their "Addons" site. > > > That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to justify > putting it into 1.0. For someone with enough website administration experience it should be matter of day or two. Of cours