Dear NANT, how can one unsubscribe from you?! Tried numerous times... no success!s
-----Original Message----- From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 10:35 PM To: cchan...@users.sourceforge.net Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [nant-dev] IDE for developing NAnt? Hi, I've been using Nano for my *nix system. I have syntax highlighting for C# on Nano if anyone needs it and the xml file can be altered to edit NAnt build files. Let me know. Thanks, Ryan On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Charles Chan <cchan...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Great feedback from everyone. Thanks. > > The general direction I received are: > 1) Keep VS (2003).sln file -- for casual developers. > 2) Keep using NAnt's build file -- for running the full build, test, docs, etc. (majority) > > I won't pursuit this topic further as most people are happy with the current workflow. > > Regards, > Charles > > --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Sean Foy <sean....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Sean Foy <sean....@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] IDE for developing NAnt? >> To: cchan...@users.sourceforge.net >> >> Personally I use GNU Emacs, even though the most popular c# >> mode is >> outdated and nobody has bothered to get flymake or mdb etc. >> support >> configured nicely. It is hard to beat VS.NET with >> ReSharper, but after >> having to do without for a few months due to corporate >> bureaucracy, I >> found that I didn't miss it much. The general editing >> features and >> support for everything else I'm doing (nxml, python, ...) >> in Emacs are >> more important to me than refactoring wizards, more >> precise >> intellisense, and better code highlighting. >> >> Eclipse was so great for Java in 2003 that I tried to use >> its C# >> perspective and that wasn't so good. MonoDevelop and >> SharpDevelop c. >> 2007 were functionally inferior to VS.NET+R#, though on the >> bright >> side one or both of them could use NAnt for building and >> also had >> intellisense for NAnt files. >> > > Thanks for the suggestions. (Options: VS Express, MonoDevelop, SharpDevelope) > >> >> I think NAnt should continue not to rely on VS.NET or any >> other IDE for its canonical build instructions. > > Absolutely agree! > >> >> One thing about the VS2003 solutions: last time I checked, >> newer >> VS.NETs could read older VS.NET solution files. What's the >> advantage >> in updating? If/when .NET 1.1 support is dropped of course >> there's no >> advantage in keeping VS2003 solution files around, but >> until then you >> can make it relatively easy for a larger set of >> contributors to build >> with less maintenance effort by keeping just the oldest >> usable >> solution file in the source tree. >> > > [[ Before you read the next statement, and to avoid any concerns, let me be absolutely clear -- I AM NOT TOUCHING THE VS FILES. I don't want anyone to become upset. :) ]] > By not upgrading the solution files, the only way to update it is ask someone with a copy of VS2003 to make the changes, or edit the XML directly. Otherwise, as soon as someone opens and save it again in a newer version, it will be converted. This shouldn't be a problem if we don't rely on VS. > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > nant-developers mailing list > nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
