RE: [nant-dev] Re: Remove support for WebDAV from task ?

2004-03-10 Thread Erick Thompson
umentation for more information. > > /// > > [TaskAttribute("enablewebdav", Required = false)] > > [BooleanValidator()] > > public bool EnableWebDAV { > > get { return _enableWebDAV; } > >

RE: [nant-dev] Remove support for WebDAV from task ?

2004-03-08 Thread Erick Thompson
I haven't used WebDAV, but if I could use it to distribute a website to a final server, it would be very very useful to me. At the moment, I have a manual FTP step is required to move a web project to the production server. Erick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:

[nant-dev] Build file broke from RC1->RC2

2003-12-22 Thread Erick Thompson
The following line in a build file I have works in 0.8.4 RC1, but not RC2 (but I did need to change filename to file). The exception I'm getting is a Format Exception, with the follow stack. The projectName property does refer to a valid file, and the file contains the XPath. If I can provid

RE: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final

2003-09-09 Thread Erick Thompson
If I just wrap a library, that introduces a dependency into NAnt. Is this ok to do? Erick > -Original Message- > From: Clayton Harbour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:24 AM > To: Erick Thompson; NAnt developers (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [

RE: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final

2003-09-09 Thread Erick Thompson
> -Original Message- > > I tend to agree with you. Corporate users don't really gel with the > > opensource style 0.x release numbers. Lets table up a list > of things to > > target at a 1.0 and see how that looks. > > Right :) As I'm corporate developer as well, I mostly agree > with

[nant-dev] RE: [Nant-users] 0.8.3 final

2003-09-08 Thread Erick Thompson
> -Original Message- > Maybe it's time to have version 1.0 released ? I believe NAnt > is stable > enough now to handle even large projects like mono both on windows and > linux and having "production" version 1.0 would only make more people > (corporate?) use nant. > > I think that nant

RE: [nant-dev] Latest build not working?

2003-09-03 Thread Erick Thompson
Ahh, I had forgotten about that. That would make it work quite nicely. Thanks, Erick > -Original Message- > From: Scott Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:49 AM > To: NAnt developers (E-mail) > Cc: Erick Thompson > Subject: Re:

RE: [nant-dev] Latest build not working?

2003-09-03 Thread Erick Thompson
from there. Is would work, but it slow. Is there a better way that I'm not seeing? Thanks, Erick > -Original Message- > From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 7:37 PM > To: Erick Thompson > Cc: NAnt developers (E-mail) > Su

RE: [nant-dev] Latest build not working?

2003-09-02 Thread Erick Thompson
't found any advantage to it at all. Erick > -----Original Message- > From: Erick Thompson > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:08 PM > To: NAnt developers (E-mail) > Subject: [nant-dev] Latest build not working? > > > I downloaded the August 31th build fro

[nant-dev] Latest build not working?

2003-09-02 Thread Erick Thompson
I downloaded the August 31th build from nant.sourceforce.net/builds, and opened the sln file in VS.NET 2003. Everything opens correctly, but it doesn't seem to be building correctly. I'm getting a whole slew of missing reference errors, missing file errors, and a locking error. Should I be able to

[nant-dev] FTP task

2003-08-29 Thread Erick Thompson
Hey, Is anyone working on the FTP task? If so, give me a shout. If not, I'm going to put together some code. I'm planning on something like the copy or delete task, where it copies a fileset to a remote server. Some sort of sync might also be an option, I'll have to give it some thought. I don't