Re: [nant-dev] DependsTask Patch (fix)

2004-01-07 Thread James C. Papp
. It looks like you are not expanding, supporting expressions, for those values unless an additional attribute dynamic is set. What is the value in this? It would seem cleaner to me to just let the on attribute be auto-expanded. - Original Message - From: James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [nant-dev] DependsTask Patch

2004-01-06 Thread James C. Papp
, for those values unless an additional attribute dynamic is set. What is the value in this? It would seem cleaner to me to just let the on attribute be auto-expanded. - Original Message - From: James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED] DependsTask Patch Here is an implementation

Re: [nant-dev] Patch for resultproperty and outputproperty attributes for exec/

2004-01-06 Thread James C. Papp
Yea, I was thinking the same thing (Ant does it this way), but sometimes you want the combined output (particularly with Windows command-line tools which seem not to get the whole stderr, stdout concept), and if you have two separate properties there is no way to recombined them in the order that

[nant-dev] Patch for resultproperty and outputproperty attributes for exec/

2004-01-05 Thread James C. Papp
Here is a patch that adds two badly needed features (well..., at least for me :-)) to the exec/ task. One is resultproperty, which is used to specify a property that will receive the exit code of the process (it more useful when failonerror is false). The other one is outputproperty, which is

[nant-dev] Patches

2004-01-05 Thread James C. Papp
Just in case the attachments for the two patches I just submitted did not make it to the list, they are also available from the sourceforge Patches feature accessible from the main page. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=31650atid=402870 James.

Re: [nant-dev] Change to call task makes upgrade difficult

2004-01-01 Thread James C. Papp
Well, reintroducing the force attribute seems like a bad idea since it has already been deprecated (but thanks for asking); its resurrection would probably just cause too much confusion. Your solution: call target=foo unless=target::has-executed('foo')/ (BTW, all the new expression evaluation

Re: [nant-dev] UPDATE: BUG: Visual-Cpp tasks fail when path for response file contains a space.

2003-11-18 Thread James C. Papp
(should be available in the next nightly build), but I fixed this for the csc compiler before ... What version of NAnt are you using ? Gert - Original Message - From: James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:57 PM Subject: [nant

[nant-dev] UPDATE: BUG: Visual-Cpp tasks fail when path for response file contains a space.

2003-11-17 Thread James C. Papp
It seems that this a general problem with anything that creates a response file. I'm seeing the same error the CSC compiler as well. James. Quoting James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BUG: Visual-Cpp tasks fail when path for response file contains a space. The code currently looks something

[nant-dev] Re: RE: RE: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] (Patches)

2003-10-06 Thread James C. Papp
Great! I will need to refresh the source with the latest code under CVS (I'm currently using code released under v0.83), though I do not think that there will be many changes. Do you want me to zip up the source files that have changed and post them to the list, or do you want me to use some

[nant-dev] RE: RE: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-03 Thread James C. Papp
RE: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] If you are getting ready for a new release, I have a bunch of patches I would love to see added to NAnt. I would be willing to work with everyone as much as needed, to see that the changes make it into the release; or some variation of them - that is,

[nant-dev] options for CompilerBase.cs

2003-09-26 Thread James C. Papp
“options” are always written first, they can never override parameters that NAnt uses… Anyway, this change would simplify our NAnt scripts significantly (we actually uses a special version of NAnt with this change that we created). So what does everyone think? James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED

[nant-dev] (no subject)

2003-09-18 Thread James C. Papp
significantly (we actually uses a special version of NAnt with this change that we created). So what does everyone think? James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http