a 4, 586 01 JIHLAVA
Tel: 567 309 136, 567 303 601
_
From: Ryan Parlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] and compiler arguments
Martin,
I just came across your post about /nowarn /c
> > For now, I'm using modified NAnt version which allow me to specify
> > additional options. I think it could be useful for others.
> If not, I'll
> give
> > up and will try to find another solution (like modify
> .csproj for /nowarn
> +
> > setting environment localization for /codepage). But
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'! nant'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] and compiler arguments
> > However, in double checking this, I found out
> However, in double checking this, I found out that the codepage option
> is not available in Visual Studio at all, and hence you can't set it
> differently for different configurations. So perhaps it's not a
> viable option for you, but maybe you can change your codepage in the
> enviornment
Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
Does anyone like this? I really need that /codepage switch to csc (called
via solution task). I'm willing to code this (or change mine implementation
to b
is very handy shortcut for this task and
just a little bit is missing...
Martin Aliger
> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:16 PM
> To: Martin Aliger; '! nant'
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] an
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'! nant'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:07 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] and compiler arguments
> Hello,
>
> I just tried to migrate to newest nightly of NAnt and found (again) that
I
> have to specify
Hello,
I just tried to
migrate to newest nightly of NAnt and found (again) that I have to
specify some custom options to csc.exe when compiling mine
projects:
I remeber there was serious complains
against this patch of mine. Maily because argume