RE: [nant-dev] FW: 0.85 release

2004-06-07 Thread John Cole
Jim, I was hoping you would say that :-) John >I looked at the msi/msm tasks (to build installs for NAnt/NAntContrib) a >couple days ago and saw that they were broken... I'll take a better look >and fix them hopefully this week. I agree that having a working install of >NAnt would be a good t

RE: [nant-dev] FW: 0.85 release

2004-06-07 Thread James Geurts
I looked at the msi/msm tasks (to build installs for NAnt/NAntContrib) a couple days ago and saw that they were broken... I'll take a better look and fix them hopefully this week. I agree that having a working install of NAnt would be a good thing. > > One thing that I would really like to have

RE: [nant-dev] FW: 0.85 release

2004-06-07 Thread John Cole
t familiar with NAnt and it's nuances. Another opinion... John Cole -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Geurts Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] FW: 0.85 release Hi all, I haven't b

[nant-dev] FW: 0.85 release

2004-06-05 Thread James Geurts
Hi all, I haven’t been watching this list (I just subscribed), but looking through the archives shows that this hasn’t been brought up for a little while.  I’m thinking that we should push a 0.85 release out the door.  It has been over 5 months since the last release, and I generally think that a