How do you specify multiple reference paths for msbuild task
I tried the following
arg value=/property:ReferencePath=${bin.dir}%3B${thirparty.bin} /
This didn't work
any ideas?
THanks,
Ram/-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:27:57 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] MSBuild
Hi Eric.
I don't see much use for NAnt except for legacy stuff.
For what it's worth, I see a place for both tools.
In a significant project I'm working on at the moment, we use MSBuild to
do the actual builds ... But we
]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] MSBuild
To: Eric Fetzer [EMAIL PROTECTED], NAnt Developers
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
What about builds targeted towards multiple frameworks? I don't that
MSBuild
Does it bug anyone else that MSBuild is almost identical to NAnt with slight
modifications like $( instead of ${ to access properties... I remember the
manager of MSBuild coming in and acting like MS was going to play so nice with
NAnt, when in reality, he was using it as a project to copy
:34 AM
To: NAnt Developers
Subject: [nant-dev] MSBuild
Does it bug anyone else that MSBuild is almost identical to NAnt with
slight modifications like $( instead of ${ to access properties... I
remember the manager of MSBuild coming in and acting like MS was going
to play so nice with NAnt, when
to a known archive directory)
Hope this helps,
Bevan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Fetzer
Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2006 4:34 a.m.
To: NAnt Developers
Subject: [nant-dev] MSBuild
Does it bug anyone else that MSBuild is almost
On 25/10/06, Bevan Arps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric.
I don't see much use for NAnt except for legacy stuff.
For what it's worth, I see a place for both tools.
In a significant project I'm working on at the moment, we use MSBuild to
do the actual builds ... But we control it by
MSBuild is obviously a child of Embrace Extend philosophy; being built-in
in the next version of the framework will do wonders in terms of promoting
the process of automated builds, which are critical to quality in our line
of work. That is a good thing. Nant is already doing it. And that is even
#1 difference - the source availability! :)
John Lam wrote:
I've spent a fair amount of time recently with MSBuild, and have the
following set of observations about its relationship to [N]Ant:
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net
You can download the MSBuild PowerPoint slides, samples, and how-to
documents, like HowToWriteATask.doc.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/pdc/agendaandsessions/sessions/default.aspx
-- look for session number TLS347.
--
sig://boB
http://foobob.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
