Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation

2004-01-14 Thread Ian MacLean
gt; To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation You mean the same task used for cleaning? Why? Jarek I don't mind, but

RE: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation

2004-01-13 Thread Nicklas Norling
Gert, if I may say so :) /Nicke > -Original Message- > From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 13 januari 2004 15:58 > To: Jaroslaw Kowalski > Cc: ! nant > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation > > > because tasks know how

Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation

2004-01-13 Thread Gert Driesen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation > You mean the same task used for cleaning? Why? > > > > > Jarek > > > I don't mind, bu

Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation

2004-01-13 Thread Jaroslaw Kowalski
You mean the same task used for cleaning? Why? Jarek > I don't mind, but we should perhaps consider having a buildmode or > something, which can be set to Build (default), Rebuild, Clean, > > Gert > --- This SF.net email is sponsored

Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation

2004-01-13 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:23 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation &

[nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force recompilation

2004-01-13 Thread Jaroslaw Kowalski
How about it ? May I commit? Jarek - Original Message - From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Block, Jeffrey A. (Jeff)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Force re