Re: [nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour

2003-03-06 Thread Scott Hernandez
ent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:02 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour > I agree with the way it's working right now, I didn't know that it was > possible to use an ANd operation using the if task, my mistake sorry. ---

Re: [nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:55 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour > > > propertyexists is false when the property does NOT exist OR the property is > > false > > sounds dangerous to me. Some operation x is supposed run or not, presumably > based

Re: [nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour

2003-03-06 Thread Philip Nelson
> propertyexists is false when the property does NOT exist OR the property is > false sounds dangerous to me. Some operation x is supposed run or not, presumably based on a carefully considered condition. If I forget to set it, I may get unexpected results. ---

Re: [nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour

2003-03-06 Thread Scott Hernandez
  I still think there is a big difference between propertyexists and propertytrue.   Take this example:   ...   or   ...     - Original Message - From: Gert Driesen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:35 AM Subject: [nant-dev] proposal :

[nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi,   I'd like to change the behaviour of the if task :   right now, the if task throw a buildexception when you use the propertyexists check and the property does not exist.   I'd like to change this behaviour to the following :   propertyexists is true when the property exists AND is true