cott Hernandez
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading
>
>
> Scott Hernandez wrote:
>
> >
> >I was imagining that we would probably scan both "." and
> "./Tasks". It
> >would not seem crazy to me to h
Scott Hernandez wrote:
>>
>
>I was thinking that the config file would spell out the explicit (but
>not absolute) paths for loading task Assemblies. And there you would add
>more entries if you wished. The default behavior would disappear and the
>new "default" would be to use the config file. I
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: Scott Hernandez
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading
>
> Scott Hernandez wrote:
>
> >I don't c
Scott Hernandez wrote:
>I don't consider this overly negative, but I am curious what the build
>patterns are.
>
What do you mean by build patterns ??
>
>
>Anyway, I really don't care one way or another, I just think that at
>this point, without more user feedback, and comments, I don't see one
>
ED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:13 AM
> To: Scott Hernandez
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading
[snip]
> I'm still not convinced that its a good idea to put those Tasks in the
> build directory. If someone really needs to do it they c
Scott Hernandez wrote:
>
>I was imagining that we would probably scan both "." and "./Tasks". It
>would not seem crazy to me to have build specific tasks in the build
>file directory.
>
>Take for example this directory structure:
>
>myproject
> myproject.build
> tasks (custom)
> src
>src.b
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:30 AM
> To: Scott Hernandez
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading
> Scott Hernandez wrote:
> > I want to bring this up as a topic of its own. We
Scott Hernandez wrote:
> I want to bring this up as a topic of its own. We have discussed what
> the behavior of loading assemblies and custom tasks before, but I
> wanted to make sure there was consensus, and a clear understanding of
> how things work.
>
>
>
> Let me start by stating how it
