Re: [Nant-users] Re: [nant-dev] Building Projects With NAnt

2003-06-27 Thread Ian MacLean
Giuseppe Greco wrote: This can be even used with recently added "named filesets" feature. You would define a (single) fileset that would keep all your *.build files and invoke various targets on it using simple one-liner without the need of a gateway file trick. I don't remember the exact synta

RE: Project Structure Ideas (Was: RE: [Nant-users] Re: [nant-dev] Building Projects With NAnt)

2003-06-27 Thread Erv Walter
We do something similar except our master build file explicitly calls the sub build files in the correct order. There is some elegance to the idea of adding a subproject without having to modify an existing build file. That doesn't work for us, and it doesn't work in general when you have cross-s

Re: [Nant-users] Re: [nant-dev] Building Projects With NAnt

2003-06-27 Thread Giuseppe Greco
Jaroslaw, First of all, thank you for your feedback! I've really appreciated it. On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 23:55, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: > I think it's a good idea to promote good build system design and I think > that your document is a step in the right direction. > > I like the idea of being ab