I don't want people to think we are ignoring this item.  We are
currently talking about this amongst ourselves and once we have a
plan, we'll let you all know.

Thanks,
Ryan

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Christopher Brandt
<xtopher.bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a better way to bundle or package non-core, user contributions? I
> understand the need to separately encapsulate the core Nant functionality.
> But I'm not sure if I understand the need to have a project that tries to
> build all the extra bits into one thing (NAnt.Contrib.Tasks.dll). Seems like
> it might be stifling contributions. To me, the problem is how to we collect
> task, function and type contributions from a bunch of different contributors
> and package it up into one installable thing.
>
> I'm not saying how the contrib project is set up is wrong, I'm just asking
> if it could be improved. And this would seem to be the right time to improve
> it.
> ---
> Chris.
>
> Continuous improvement is better than delayed perfection. - Mark Twain
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Pento, Michael <mpe...@metratech.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Looking at the page for the project on SourceForge, it looks like the last
>> real commit activity was “445 days” ago, although, there seems to be some
>> defect records that conflict with that number.
>>
>>
>>
>> I look into it some more, I want to add some new custom tasks of mine,
>> but, I want to make sure that the project is not orphaned first.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:21 AM
>> To: Pento, Michael; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: RE: NAntContrib seems rather dead?
>>
>>
>>
>> I've been using the exec task to run svn for years. nant contrib was just
>> not keeping up with svn changes.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Pento, Michael [mailto:mpe...@metratech.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:11 AM
>> To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [NAnt-users] NAntContrib seems rather dead?
>>
>>
>>
>> As I was sitting here wondering why the “svn” tasks in nantcontrib seemed
>> so incredibly broken, I realized that the contrib project has not had
>> movement in a long time.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t even know if the project is directly related to the main NAnt
>> project (ever or anymore …), I was just curious if that is considered a
>> “dead” project?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NAnt-users mailing list
>> NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NAnt-users mailing list
> NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NAnt-users mailing list
NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users

Reply via email to