Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8020224/
-Sundar
Changeset: d480015ab732
Author:lagergren
Date: 2013-07-09 15:56 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8/nashorn/rev/d480015ab732
8020124: In the case of an eval switch, we might need explicit conversions of
the tag store, as it was not known in the surrounding environmen
That said, we are planning to support multiple threads using a worker model
(post-JDK8.) The underlying mechanism used to implement workers is shipping
with JDK8 (loadWithNewGlobal), so it will be possible to implement a similar
model yourself. You can run the following with 'jjs -scripting':
Changeset: d3f4e5dea634
Author:attila
Date: 2013-07-09 13:57 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8/nashorn/rev/d3f4e5dea634
8009758: reactivate the 8006529 test.
Reviewed-by: jlaskey, sundar
! src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codegen/Attr.java
! src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codege
Changeset: 7538a59ca241
Author:sundar
Date: 2013-07-09 17:37 +0530
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8/nashorn/rev/7538a59ca241
8014785: Ability to extend global instance by binding properties of another
object
Reviewed-by: attila, hannesw, jlaskey, lagergren
! src/jdk/na
+1
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 05:03 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
Please review JDK-8009758 at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8009758/webrev.00
Thanks,
Attila.
+1
On 2013-07-09, at 3:53 AM, A. Sundararajan
wrote:
> Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8014785/
>
> -Sundar
Updated webrev. Please review.
-Sundar
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 02:38 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote:
Please ignore this webrev. There is java.beans dependency and I am
going to remove it.
Will post another webrev send request again.
-Sundar
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 12:23 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote
Please review JDK-8009758 at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8009758/webrev.00
Thanks,
Attila.
Hi,
thanks for experimenting with Nashorn!
As far as your example is concerned, Nashorn is not thread safe by design.
Indeed, if you evaluate
new NashornScriptEngineFactory().getParameter("THREADING")
it'll return null, which means "the engine implementation is not thread safe,
and c
Please review JDK-8016681: regex capture behaves differently than on V8:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8016681/
Thanks,
Hannes
Please ignore this webrev. There is java.beans dependency and I am going
to remove it.
Will post another webrev send request again.
-Sundar
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 12:23 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote:
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8014785/
-Sundar
Hi there,
we're currently planning to switch our infrastructure from Rhino to Nashorn but
are experiencing some threading Issues that nobody addressed so far.
I tweeted with Jim Laskey and he kindly asked me to post it to this list.
Example:
https://gist.github.com/tobsch/5955518
Could could
13 matches
Mail list logo