I believe that's a reasonable approach. The JavaScript "Global" object is
actually ENGINE_SCOPE level state, so you should be fine.
Attila.
On Jul 13, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>
>> Actually, in your above example, since
On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> Actually, in your above example, since the JavaScript program has no explicit
> guarding of concurrent access to variable `i` you seem like you would
> actually even expect to have an engine that has "THREAD-ISOLATED" as its
> threading mode