Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8020731/
-Sundar
Hi Jim,
this example shows it pretty well:
https://gist.github.com/tobsch/6026942
as the script itself is very simple and does nothing special. It's only its
invocation or doPrivileged to be precise.
This is the profiler output:
Any ideas?
Best,
Tobias
Am 17.07.2013 um 18:23 schrieb Jim
Hi,
Addressing one of the questions:
* importClass : by default, Nashorn does not support importClass. But,
it is possible to load "mozilla_compat.js" to support rhino extensions
like importClass.
load("nashorn:mozilla_compat.js");
importClass(java.util.Vector);
Also, it is possibl
Going to forward to the fx experts.
On 2013-07-17, at 1:55 PM, TA Hubbard wrote:
> Dear Sirs;
>
> A fundamental feature of JavaFX's FXML is scripting. The process is simple;
> add the 'processing instruction' to standard FXML
> processing instructions (JavaFX import declarations or stateme
Dear Sirs;
A fundamental feature of JavaFX's FXML is scripting. The process is
simple; add the 'processing instruction' to
standard FXML processing instructions (JavaFX import declarations or
statements) then script.
As you know, some of the scripting languages include JavaScript, JavaFX,
Tobias,
Would you send some more detailed code snippets (or gist link)?
Cheers,
-- Jim
On 2013-07-17, at 1:35 PM, Tobias Schlottke wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> sounds pretty reasonable to me.
> I still have the problem that I want to return something in run() though, so
> this renders a bit more co
Hi Jim,
sounds pretty reasonable to me.
I still have the problem that I want to return something in run() though, so
this renders a bit more complicated.
I understand that you have to check security once but I don't really understand
why in my case because the object should not have changed.
Do
Tobias,
We'll look into removing the doPrivileged on first entry (security is checked
elsewhere), but we need to do a security assessment before proceeding.
That said, I would recommend as a best practice to use a per-thread JavaScript
loop instead, to avoid such issues. I generally use a
jav
Changeset: 3d6f6b8d8bc8
Author:hannesw
Date: 2013-07-17 18:20 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8/nashorn/rev/3d6f6b8d8bc8
8020356: ClassCastException Undefined->Scope on spiltter class generated for a
large switch statement
Reviewed-by: jlaskey, attila
! src/jdk/na
+1
On 2013-07-17, at 12:22 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer
wrote:
> Please review JDK-8020356 - ClassCastException Undefined->Scope on spiltter
> class generated for a large switch statement:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8020356/
>
> Thanks,
> Hannes
Hi there,
I've built a small case where I evaluate a compiled script equipped with a
custom bindings.
The script is equipped with some variables and and compiled like this:
engine.put("shopId", "test");
runner = (Bindings)
engine.compile(ad.getCondition_script().getCode()).eval();
Please review JDK-8020356 - ClassCastException Undefined->Scope on
spiltter class generated for a large switch statement:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8020356/
Thanks,
Hannes
Changeset: 71cfe4e66bcb
Author:jlaskey
Date: 2013-07-17 11:53 -0300
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8/nashorn/rev/71cfe4e66bcb
8020596: Initialization of white space strings in scanner should be done with
\u strings
Reviewed-by: attila, hannesw
Contributed-by: james.las.
+1
On Jul 17, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Jim Laskey (Oracle)
wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8020596/webrev.00/index.html
>
Looks good to me.
Hannes
Am 2013-07-17 16:25, schrieb Jim Laskey (Oracle):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8020596/webrev.00/index.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8020596/webrev.00/index.html
16 matches
Mail list logo
