Code persistence is on the list for near future enhancements. There are lots
of minor things as well - 1-2 day tasks.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Tal Liron wrote:
> That's reasonable. (I guess you're referring to the final death of the
> permgen when you're talking about memory issues?)
>
>
On 12/03/2013 02:34 PM, Tal Liron wrote:
That's reasonable. (I guess you're referring to the final death of the
permgen when you're talking about memory issues?)
So, what are your thoughts on the JVM7 port? Do you think it's
entirely non-viable? Pointless? Would result in a very poorly
perfor
That's reasonable. (I guess you're referring to the final death of the
permgen when you're talking about memory issues?)
So, what are your thoughts on the JVM7 port? Do you think it's entirely
non-viable? Pointless? Would result in a very poorly performing engine?
The future: My burning wish
There might be some aspects of that, but it is 99% technical. There are some
major changes required to the JVM to support Nashorn properly in JDK 7 (perform
well, no memory bloat, security et al.) And then the question is, why don't we
backport those changes to the JVM? Well, then it becomes
