Can't whatever is being done in the static initializer be moved to be done
lazily when the AppleScriptEngine is actually used.
On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:21 AM, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)"
wrote:
> I'm filing a bug against AppleScriptEngine.jar. Other than removing it,
> there is no long term fix. BT
Can't whatever is being done in the static initializer be moved to be done
lazily when the AppleScriptEngine is actually used.
On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:21 AM, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)"
wrote:
> I'm filing a bug against AppleScriptEngine.jar. Other than removing it,
> there is no long term fix. BT
On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> Actually, in your above example, since the JavaScript program has no explicit
> guarding of concurrent access to variable `i` you seem like you would
> actually even expect to have an engine that has "THREAD-ISOLATED" as its
> threading mode
On Jun 30, 2013, at 11:40 PM, A. Sundararajan
wrote:
> Nashorn implements ECMAScript 262 Edition 5.1 (
> http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/ ). Top level "JSON" object
> and it's 'parse' and 'stringify' methods are specified in that specification.
>
> There are a few nashorn spec
First post so apologies if my terminology is off.
I started experimenting with jjs today and thought I would have a go at loading
some JSON data that's of interest to me. So I started Googling around for the
best way to do that.
I quickly figured out that within jjs there's a top level object
