Re: Changes in Java 9

Excellent, that appears to work. Thanks both! On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan < sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com> wrote: > Adding to what Hannes said. In case if you cannot modify existing code, > you can also pass options to nashorn engine via System propert

Re: Changes in Java 9

Adding to what Hannes said. In case if you cannot modify existing code, you can also pass options to nashorn engine via System property "nashorn.args" - all nashorn engines created in the process will be initialized with those options. For example: java -Dnashorn.args="-ot=false" Main See

Re: Changes in Java 9

Hi Nils, Thanks for the code. Unfortunately you hit a bug in optimistic types, which is enabled by default in JDK 9. I’ve filed an issue for it and have a fix for it. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193508 The good news is that it is quite easy to work around this bug by disabling op

Re: Changes in Java 9

Hannes, I've sent an email with zip file attachment. Just letting you know in a separate email, in case it ends up being blocked. Nils On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Hannes Wallnöfer < hannes.wallnoe...@oracle.com> wrote: > That would be https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/ but you need an OpenJDK

Re: Changes in Java 9

That would be https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/ but you need an OpenJDK account to file a bug. Alternatively, if you can send me something reproduce the bug (could be a small snippet of code) I can file it for you. Hannes > Am 06.12.2017 um 16:15 schrieb Nils Kilden-Pedersen : > > What's the ri

Re: Changes in Java 9

What's the right place to file a bug? On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Nils Kilden-Pedersen wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up. It made me realize that my post was > incomplete. > > These are the steps I take: > >1. Initial step: Call engine.compile with the CS compiler source + >Coffee

Re: Changes in Java 9

Thanks for bringing this up. It made me realize that my post was incomplete. These are the steps I take: 1. Initial step: Call engine.compile with the CS compiler source + CoffeeScript.compile(coffeeCode, {runtime: 'none'}); which returns CompiledScript that is retained and re-used. This

Re: Changes in Java 9

Hi Nils, Are you just evaluating the script files you linked in your first message, or trying to do some further processing? Using the jjs tool from JDK 9.0.1 I see no errors running both versions of CoffeeScript. Hannes > Am 03.12.2017 um 21:08 schrieb Nils Kilden-Pedersen : > > Ok, the min

Re: Changes in Java 9

Ok, the minified vs non-minified may not be identical. I cannot find the default parameters in the minified version, so perhaps those are removed. What does remain however, is that I can compile minified cs2 on JDK 8_144, but not on 9.0

Re: Changes in Java 9

Further testing with the un-minified code (cs2 , cs1 ) reveals the true problems in JDK 9.0.1 In cs2, it’s ES6 syntax (default args), which (unexpectedly for me at