Hi,
I was playing with epoll and changed driver to see if performance will
be better with it. Using ab utility i actually got worse performance
with epoll, i suspect may be i implemented it not very effectively.
Am 23.01.2007 um 17:14 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
and lighttpd also uses sendfile which is faster than user-spave
read-send operation fastpath uses
There you go. They do it all in kernel. I guess this can't be beat.
Anyways, it is good to know where we stand.
On 1/23/07, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 23.01.2007 um 17:14 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
and lighttpd also uses sendfile which is faster than user-spave
read-send operation fastpath uses
There you go. They do it all in kernel. I guess this can't be beat.
Anyways, it is good to
How are you using ab? What exactly are you testing?
ab -n 1000 -n 15 http://localhost/1
And remember why poll() is inefficient: it's the scanning of the array
of active file descriptors. The whole array needs to be scanned even
if only one socket has a new event. Therefore you'd expect
We do not need it, using sendfile as etc has its own limitations, only
for static files, no templates and other dynamic stuff. For only static
files lighttpd is fine and it is more effective to use it instead of
using naviserver
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 1/23/07, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL
