Re: [naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-14 Thread Stephen Deasey
On 9/9/06, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow! It is great to see how much you (and Bernd) > have done in so little time... Congratulations! > This is what we can base our documentation on, the question is: do we convert it into doctools or keep as html? Or put it in a wiki. AP

Re: [naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-14 Thread Stephen Deasey
On 9/9/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 09.09.2006, at 00:18, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > > http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/nsdocs/ > > A little bit converted but still in HTML Wow! It is great to see how much you (and Bernd) have done in so little time... Congratulations! A s

Re: [naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-09 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On 09.09.2006, at 17:21, Vlad Seryakov wrote: Ok, then i will start polishing it and will import into CVS under html/ Perhaps others may comment as well before you invest more time... Let the people say what they think. If nobody objects (or has some other breath-taking idea) then continue..

Re: [naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-09 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Ok, then i will start polishing it and will import into CVS under html/ Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: On 09.09.2006, at 16:31, Vlad Seryakov wrote: This is what we can base our documentation on, the question is: do we convert it into doctools or keep as html? Why would you want to convert it in do

Re: [naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-09 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On 09.09.2006, at 16:31, Vlad Seryakov wrote: This is what we can base our documentation on, the question is: do we convert it into doctools or keep as html? Why would you want to convert it in doctools? Such high-level docs is perfectly OK to be kept in HTML mode... Allright, if we'd to make

Re: [naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-09 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Wow! It is great to see how much you (and Bernd) have done in so little time... Congratulations! This is what we can base our documentation on, the question is: do we convert it into doctools or keep as html?

Re: [naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-08 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On 09.09.2006, at 00:18, Vlad Seryakov wrote: http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/nsdocs/ A little bit converted but still in HTML Wow! It is great to see how much you (and Bernd) have done in so little time... Congratulations! A side note: anybody still usin ns_share? NOTE: The use of n

[naviserver-devel] Second set of documentation

2006-09-08 Thread Vlad Seryakov
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/nsdocs/ A little bit converted but still in HTML -- Vlad Seryakov 571 262-8608 office [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/