[Nbd] [PATCHv7] docs/proto.md: Clarify SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc

2016-04-12 Thread Alex Bligh
These are changes which possibly have semantic effect * Clarify that SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc. when in capitals have an RFC 2119 meaning using the wording within that RFC. * Fix some lowercase use of these words which actually were meant to be uppercase. * Fix some lowercase 'should' which cl

Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv7] docs/proto.md: Clarify SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc

2016-04-13 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/12/2016 12:35 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: > These are changes which possibly have semantic effect > > * Clarify that SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc. when in capitals have an > RFC 2119 meaning using the wording within that RFC. > > * Fix some lowercase use of these words which actually were > meant

Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv7] docs/proto.md: Clarify SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc

2016-04-14 Thread Alex Bligh
On 13 Apr 2016, at 22:33, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/12/2016 12:35 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: >> These are changes which possibly have semantic effect >> >> * Clarify that SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc. when in capitals have an >> RFC 2119 meaning using the wording within that RFC. >> >> * Fix some lower

Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv7] docs/proto.md: Clarify SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc

2016-04-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:33:56PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Is there anything still holding this up, or can we get it applied? It's > acting as a conflict magnet for other patches that are still under > discussion. Merged it this morning, as well as Alex' "two nits" followup (but apparently forg

Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv7] docs/proto.md: Clarify SHOULD / MUST / MAY etc

2016-04-14 Thread Alex Bligh
On 14 Apr 2016, at 13:43, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:33:56PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> Is there anything still holding this up, or can we get it applied? It's >> acting as a conflict magnet for other patches that are still under >> discussion. > > Merged it this morni