On 16 Apr 2016, at 18:30, Alex Bligh wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm interested in confirmation that this approach works for people.
>>
>> Sure does.
>
> Great. As you can see I've done the structured replies extension too
> now.
>
>> Detail: might be an idea to retain the "extensions" section, but have
Wouter,
On 16 Apr 2016, at 18:06, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:18:37PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>> I've moved out WRITE_ZEROES on my own github account (so
>> we can all see what this looks like).
>
> Part of the reason I gave you push access was so you woul
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:18:37PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> I've moved out WRITE_ZEROES on my own github account (so
> we can all see what this looks like).
Part of the reason I gave you push access was so you wouldn't have to do
that ;-)
Just push it to my repo. Don't be too afraid t
On 15 Apr 2016, at 14:25, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 15 Apr 2016, at 14:18, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
>> Branch 'separate-extensions' is what would end up in master,
>> and proto.md looks like this:
>> https://github.com/abligh/nbd/blob/extension-write-zeroes/doc/proto.md
>
> Arrggh
>
> https://gi
On 15 Apr 2016, at 14:18, Alex Bligh wrote:
> Branch 'separate-extensions' is what would end up in master,
> and proto.md looks like this:
> https://github.com/abligh/nbd/blob/extension-write-zeroes/doc/proto.md
Arrggh
https://github.com/abligh/nbd/blob/separate-extensions/doc/proto.md
--
Wouter et al,
On 14 Apr 2016, at 17:16, Alex Bligh wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2016, at 16:38, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
>>> My proposal is as follows:
>>>
>>> * Experimental extensions do not appear in proto.md in master at all
>>> EXCEPT for reservation of codes (e.g. "NBD_OPT_FOOBAR (42) - reserved
Eric,
On 14 Apr 2016, at 17:45, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> I'll leave it until the patient is in recovery before doing that one.
>>>
>>> Structured replies is (famous last words) already in that state.
>
> Stable, but not out of observation yet (while I _have_ done scratch
> implementations of INFO
On 04/14/2016 10:38 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:16:28PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>> Wouter,
>>
>> On 14 Apr 2016, at 16:38, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> This sounds like a viable approach,
>>
>> I propose I come up with a patch to move the current experimental
>> stuff ou
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:16:28PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> Wouter,
>
> On 14 Apr 2016, at 16:38, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > This sounds like a viable approach,
>
> I propose I come up with a patch to move the current experimental
> stuff out to a branch then.
>
> As Erik currently is perform
Wouter,
On 14 Apr 2016, at 16:38, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> My proposal is as follows:
>>
>> * Experimental extensions do not appear in proto.md in master at all
>> EXCEPT for reservation of codes (e.g. "NBD_OPT_FOOBAR (42) - reserved
>> for experimental FOOBAR extension").
>>
>> * Experimen
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 01:46:35PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> I have a proposal for the more efficient treatment of experimental
> protocol extensions. This primarily concerns doc/proto.md, but
> potentially affects code too.
>
> At present the experimental protocol extensions are described in
> '
I have a proposal for the more efficient treatment of experimental
protocol extensions. This primarily concerns doc/proto.md, but
potentially affects code too.
At present the experimental protocol extensions are described in
'experimental extensions' at the bottom of the document in master.
This c
12 matches
Mail list logo
