[Neo4j] Re: Queries on moving from Neo4J Embedded+SDN to Neo4J Server

2014-03-19 Thread Chandra
Hello, Per the link ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22065697/neo4j-sdn-3-0-0-executingrestapi-getnodebyid-is-invoced-repeatedly) shared by @Mordechai Tamamhttp://stackoverflow.com/users/1107298/mordechai-tamamon SO page, it has been mentioned that REST is not recommended with SDN. Does

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j as a service?

2014-03-19 Thread Kevin Burton
As I stated before when I execute bin/neo4j start I get a message: 'C:\Neo4j\neo4j-community-2.0.1bin\neo4j start This command is not supported by the Neo4j utility. Please try Neo4j.bat help for more info. On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:46:47 PM UTC-5, Michael Hunger wrote: Kevin,

Re: [Neo4j] Spring Data Neo4j: LabelBasedStrategyCypherHelper.getNodesWithLabel executed for every returned node (slow performance)

2014-03-19 Thread Lorenzo Speranzoni (@inserpio)
Trying to give you some of my bandwidth :) I thought that changing LabelBasedNodeTypeRepresentationStrategy.readAliasFrom in the following way would have provided some benefits, but no… performance slowdown comes from somewhere else... Of course I'm missing almost everything about SDN

Re: [Neo4j] Re: SDN 3.0.1 Backward compatibility

2014-03-19 Thread BtySgtMajor
Mike, if you only added the base-package attribute but didn't do any of the other changes you mentioned, did the build work or still fail? I have base-package set in both neo4j:config and neo4j:repositories, but I still get that build error. I suppose I should try reviewing the POJO in

Re: [Neo4j] Re: SDN 3.0.1 Backward compatibility

2014-03-19 Thread Michael Hunger
Not that these are different packages for domain entities and repositories Sent from mobile device Am 19.03.2014 um 18:56 schrieb BtySgtMajor btysgtma...@gmail.com: Mike, if you only added the base-package attribute but didn't do any of the other changes you mentioned, did the build work or

Re: [Neo4j] Re: SDN 3.0.1 Backward compatibility

2014-03-19 Thread BtySgtMajor
Yes, I totally understand that, and they are different. On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:17:55 PM UTC-4, Michael Hunger wrote: Not that these are different packages for domain entities and repositories Sent from mobile device Am 19.03.2014 um 18:56 schrieb BtySgtMajor

[Neo4j] Slave not available after upgrade

2014-03-19 Thread Kiran Kumar Reddy Sathi
I have set up a neo4j cluster(2.0) with 3 nodes. I am able to see all the nodes (1 master + 2 slaves) available. Note i haven't created nodes yet. I want to copy my offline graph data from neo4j 1.8 version to my new cluster. I have followed the steps from the following link.

Re: [Neo4j] Re: Neo4j Cluster doesn't function well

2014-03-19 Thread Virat Gohil
Hi, We had similar issues when we started with Neo4J cluster with AWS EC2. Our problem went away when we introduced an arbiter (as we had only 2 instances and the doc says it should either be 3 or 2+arbiter). Not sure if this will help you as you already have 3 instances, but you could give it a

[Neo4j] StackOverFlow error when creating a Gist

2014-03-19 Thread Amit Jain
Hi I am trying to create a grpah gist with about 1300 nodes and 2000 relationships. But the console is giving the following error: HTTP ERROR 500 Problem accessing /console/cypher. Reason: Server Error Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError at

[Neo4j] Re: Neo4j Cluster doesn't function well

2014-03-19 Thread Kiran Kumar Reddy Sathi
I am also facing the same issue. Please let me know if you have resolved this. Thanks. On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 13:18:54 UTC+5:30, Or Tzabary wrote: Hey, I've launched 3 large instances on AWS EC2 and installed Neo4j on the servers, I also configured them to work as a cluster (I was

Re: [Neo4j] first time a query is run it produces different results in 2.1.0-M01

2014-03-19 Thread Tom Zeppenfeldt
Hi Mattias, thanks for the update. We are really struggling with this one, because we are at a performance with Neo4j at about 4 sec and a comparable query in a MariaDB SQL instance of 0.17 sec. On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 14:32:28 UTC+1, Mattias Persson wrote: This issue has been fixed and

Re: [Neo4j] Tuning/ performance / predictability

2014-03-19 Thread Tom Zeppenfeldt
Michael, are there any new insights on this ? We are still at 4 seconds to do this on Neo4j 2.0.1 against 0.17 secs on a MariaDB instance with a comparable query. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Neo4j group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop