Will surely bring up the old checkpoint and do exact steps to repro. Will
be back in a day or so.
Thanks a lot for the interest and the response.
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Mattias Persson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That definitely sounds worrying and unexpected. If you could make
> available
Hi,
That definitely sounds worrying and unexpected. If you could make available
code to reproduce this it would be most helpful.
On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 7:17:06 AM UTC+2, varun kumar wrote:
>
> I have created a neo4j DB locally and assigned some indices and unique
> constraint.
>
> Here i
This query spans up a lot of paths, did you run it with PROFILE on your dataset?
Some suggestions:
* you don't do anything with the first :SalesRelation is that intentional? if
yes then move it to a where clause so it doesn't span up paths
* your second match is NOT bound at all? is it is potent
How do you do CTE queries in neo4j?
SAMPLE QUERY:
MATCH (rootTopic:Company)-[:Seller|Buyer]->(:SalesRelation) WHERE
rootTopic.ID = 172096
MATCH
(sellerCompanyTopic:Company)-[rel:Seller]->(sr:SalesRelation)-[rel2:Buyer]-(buyer:Company),
sr<-[:PriceAgreement]-(contract:Contract)
OPTIONAL MATCH
