> Cheers,
> Davide
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Anders Nawroth
> wrote:
>
>> I think you are right, we should exclude the transitive dependencies and
>> add back the correct versions.
>>
>> This looks like the correct place to do it:
>>
&g
e way, I would be happy to create a patch for this.
>
> Davide
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Anders Nawroth
> wrote:
>
>> Have you tried excluding the conflicting transitive dependencies and
>> adding them back with the correct version?
>>
>> /
he conflicts caused by
>>>> "org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-1.9:jar:2.0.3" and
>>>> "org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-2.0:jar:2.0.3":
>>>>
>>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.0.3:compile - omitted
>>>>
How did you add org.neo4j:neo4j to the project?
Any duplicates or conflicts should be resolved automatically, at least when
using Maven.
The neo4j-cypher-compiler-* modules are special -- they add support for the
syntax from previous versions and are not duplicates.
This is the final dependency tr
Thanks for the input Rodger and everyone who chimed in!
I'll make sure to mention the pom.xml file, that's a good suggestion.
Can't really go into any depth on tools like Maven; maybe we can provide
more links though.
Full source code inside the manual doesn't work well with Java, so we link
to
y( "name", "C" );
> D.setProperty( "name", "D" );
> tx.success();
> return A;
> }
> }
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "N
his case.
> nodeResult = node + ": " + node.getProperty( "name" );
> }
> }
>
>
> Are these examples updated? What am I missing here? I just want get a List
> of nodes having a particular label..
>
> --
> You received this message becaus
