I was wondering if Neo4j supports subgraph isomorphism (finding pattern in
a target), if both graphs come from the database. I'm quite new to Neo4j
but to me it seems that the pattern is only described by Cypher language.
However, what if I have some interesting and decently sized graph, and I
uot;:[{"statement":"MATCH (n:ClassType) WHERE n.fqn = {
fqn } RETURN n LIMIT
1","parameters":{"fqn":"javax.swing.JLabel"},"resultDataContents":["graph"],"includeStats":false}]}
*
Thanks in advance,
Ivan
On Wednes
estimate, so let's say 10-15..
Any idea?
On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 4:22:47 AM UTC+1, Luanne wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> When you create relationships, are the nodes on either end already
> persisted? Or are you creating both new nodes and relationships to those in
it has some fixes in this regard.
>
> Michael
>
> Am 17.11.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Ivan Senic >:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am quite new to neoj4 and I started using it with the neo4j-ogm to map
> my java objects into the graph and back. I am experiencing quite a strange
> behav
Hi,
I am quite new to neoj4 and I started using it with the neo4j-ogm to map my
java objects into the graph and back. I am experiencing quite a strange
behavior when I start saving entities via OGM into the graph. It seams that
the memory usage rises fast on the neo4j-server (I also experienced
s as entity
fields, to be exact go through *conversionService*. Alternative would be to
enable to inject custom *objectMapper* with registered serializers and
deserializers and not to create default one. Any thoughts on this matter?
Best regards,
Ivan Leš
--
You received this message b
llowed = **coalesce(**b.followed,0)+1*
> *RETURN r*
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:53 AM, ivan limonov
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello
>> I run the following command in neo4j using Cypher:
>> *MATCH (a:User), (b:User)*
>> *WHERE a.id <http://a.id
Hello
I run the following command in neo4j using Cypher:
*MATCH (a:User), (b:User)*
*WHERE a.id = 1 AND b.id = 2*
*merge (a)-[r:FOLLOW]->(b) ON CREATE SET a.follow = a.follow+1, b.followed
= b.followed+1*
*RETURN r*
Is it possible that the counter follow or followed is not updated?
I mean partial
