Re: [neonixie-l] Question about trigger tube

2013-07-11 Thread Grahame Marsh
Hi Clarke, Please be aware that XC18 based clocks fail to count reliably in complete darkness - my experience with one clock but I believe experienced by others. I'd expect two electrode neons to behave similarly but I've no direct experience. My XC18 clock I keep as a demonstration clock

[neonixie-l] Re: Anyone else having problems with unreliable IN-1 tubes ?

2013-07-11 Thread threeneurons
The IN-1 does not contain mercury, so it has a shorter lifespan. I had a similar problem with some IN-4s. But that one, the zero, in the 10 hours position, would be eaten away in only about a year. Of course, the little tid bits of metal would short other nearby cathodes. I think as a rule of

RE: [neonixie-l] Re: Anyone else having problems with unreliable IN-1tubes ?

2013-07-11 Thread chuck richards
My answer to it is to have a toggle switch on my clocks that turns the tubes on and off. The tubes are off most of the time, and turned on when the clock is to be enjoyed. My most recent clock has (6) NL-6844A tubes, and those don't have mercury. Chuck Original Message From:

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: ZM1251

2013-07-11 Thread kay486
Nice and very interesting piece. It seems like the ZM1251 is just a version with two decimal points. I wonder if those tubes had long life. Maybe you could upload this tube to your site with more photos (when you have time ofcrouse) as you do with normal nixie tubes. On Thursday, 11 July 2013