Re: [neonixie-l] Interesting kit...

On 2021-04-29 8:26 p.m., Nicholas Stock wrote: 1382%7Cparentrq%3A202a065d1790a69d56791051efa8%7Ciid%3A1 no idea why they use a 7805 that size (aesthetics probably), but interesting nonetheless the big TO-3 regulators were rated for higher current than the TO-220 versions.

Re: [neonixie-l] Interesting kit...

Wow, that's beautiful. On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 8:26 PM Nicholas Stock wrote: > Not my auction etc. > > >

Re: [neonixie-l] Interesting kit...

that's bazzarro! ~ *mcvei...@gmail.com * On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 5:27 PM Nicholas Stock wrote: > Not my auction etc. > > >

Re: [neonixie-l] IN-23 (ИН-23) 10-digit-alphanumeric nixie clock/display

Is there that much of a range in brightness of the tubes, or is that a camera artifact of multiplexing the power? Nice to see something I wouldn't be able to find enough tubes or money to make in action! On Friday, 30 April 2021 at 00:59:44 UTC+1 Terry Bowman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021,

[neonixie-l] Interesting kit...

Not my auction etc.

Re: [neonixie-l] IN-23 (ИН-23) 10-digit-alphanumeric nixie clock/display

> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 5:21 PM Roman H. > wrote: > https://youtu.be/ZfoV3-rsbNQ O_O > On Apr 28, 2021, at 6:46 PM, tntmod54321 wrote: > > That looks amazing, how much did that cost you? $_$ Terry Bowman, KA4HJH "The Mac Doctor"

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: B7971 DUSTOFF Board Interest

That's a good point. I never noticed that the center vertical segment was one piece. On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 11:42:03 PM UTC-4 Richard Scales wrote: > The only problem in doing that - as far as I can tell - is that the B5971 > does not have the same number of segments, I believe that