Re: [neonixie-l] OT: Epic fives

2021-10-19 Thread Bartek Ogryz
What about "6" and "9" ;) ? The cost may not be so tiny - think about all the preparations, that have to be made, to produce a digit (project, matrix for the cutter, etc.) Bartek. wtorek, 19 października 2021 o 10:51:10 UTC+2 artgod...@googlemail.com napisał(a): > It always surprised me that

Re: [neonixie-l] OT: Epic fives

2021-10-19 Thread Adrian Godwin
It always surprised me that the inverted 2 is used. The cost saving must be tiny, given that only the character itself is re-used (once it's had supports added it's probably unique) and it's only 1 of 10 characters. On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 7:36 AM Marcin Adamski wrote: > nah, they were the

Re: [neonixie-l] OT: Epic fives

2021-10-19 Thread Marcin Adamski
nah, they were the precursors of the new trend!  On 19/10/2021 17:30, Audrey wrote: The reason the soviets did that is cost saving. That looks cool though. On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, 2:30 AM Marcin Adamski wrote: Hi All, I have just received reminder to purchase my ski pass for next

Re: [neonixie-l] OT: Epic fives

2021-10-19 Thread Audrey
The reason the soviets did that is cost saving. That looks cool though. On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, 2:30 AM Marcin Adamski wrote: > Hi All, > > I have just received reminder to purchase my ski pass for next season > and I really enjoy the shape of fives on it (see the picture). I always > thought