[neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2012-12-30 Thread Greg P
When can we expect all the files to be available? On Dec 17, 8:58 pm, Raymond Weisling wrote: > I am preparing (almost finished) putting together a number of folders > containing all design and production info on these products. The data will > be in ZIP'd or RAR'd files. (Preference?) > >

[neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2012-12-30 Thread MichaelB
Ingrate! On Sunday, December 30, 2012 7:08:37 PM UTC-8, Greg P wrote: > > When can we expect all the files to be available? > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 8:58 pm, Raymond Weisling wrote: > > I am preparing (almost finished) putting together a number of folders > > containing all design and prod

[neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-02-15 Thread Greg P
C'mon Ray, what's taking so long, it's been almost 2 months. I guess it's another failed promise. On Dec 31 2012, 2:32 am, MichaelB wrote: > Ingrate! > > > > > > > > On Sunday, December 30, 2012 7:08:37 PM UTC-8, Greg P wrote: > > > When can we expect all the files to be available? > > > On D

[neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-02-15 Thread MichaelB
Young man, please have a little respect for your elders.. On Friday, February 15, 2013 1:55:19 PM UTC-8, Greg P wrote: > > C'mon Ray, what's taking so long, it's been almost 2 months. I guess > it's another failed promise. > > > > > On Dec 31 2012, 2:32 am, MichaelB wrote: > > Ingrate! > >

[neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-03-17 Thread Greg P
Nothing has happened but this is par for the course with Ray. Don't hold your breath waiting. BTW, I'm sure I'll get flamed by some of the message board cops here for being too harsh on Ray. If you want a superior FLW buy the one Jeff Thomas sells; not only is it better, but you will actually re

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-02-15 Thread Adam Jacobs
Comments like this one should have been made in private, I think. Sorry, didn't mean to feed the troll. :S -Adam On 2/15/2013 1:55 PM, Greg P wrote: C'mon Ray, what's taking so long, it's been almost 2 months. I guess it's another failed promise. On Dec 31 2012, 2:32 am, MichaelB wrote:

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-02-16 Thread Jonathan Peakall
Respect? For the guy who is a known thief? Ray is the definition of chutzpa, killing his parents and then begging for mercy because he is an orphan. This list has been way more forgiving than he deserves. Jonathan On 2/15/2013 8:12 PM, MichaelB wrote: Young man, please have a little respect

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-02-16 Thread Adam Jacobs
Wow, that's a lot of venom, whoever you are. Take it to a private email, this list is not the appropriate venue. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jonathan Peakall wrote: > Respect? For the guy who is a known thief? Ray is the definition of > chutzpa, killing his parents and then begging for mer

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-02-16 Thread Frank Bemelman
Another self appointed moderator, whoever you are. Take it to a private email, this list is not the appropriate venue. From: Adam Jacobs Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 7:01 AM To: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain Wow, that&#

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: GeekKlok, FLW data to be in Public Domain

2013-03-19 Thread Jonathan Peakall
It's amazing how folks still cut him slack. A thief is a thief, I don't know why one would hesitate to say so, let alone stand up for him. Hmmm, better duck now. I was soundly berated by the board cops last time. Funny, OK to slap me for slamming Ray, but no slap for the thief himself. Jon