[neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-28 Thread Bill Notfaded
Wow Michael! That wood looks really good. You always use really nice hardware as well. I guess since you machine things so well skimping on cruddy hardware just isn't an option and why would it be! My 8971 clock with the gold colored hardware option and that green PCB contrast with the

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-26 Thread Nicholas Stock
Nice work Michael!! (As usual!) Good to know they fit the board, I stlll have to make mine up Cheers, Nick Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 26, 2021, at 06:54, MichaelB wrote: > >  > Here they are in a black NixiSat with a finished base. Still have to make > taller colon towers, but

[neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-26 Thread Dalibor
Hi! 8k2 value is proven and totally safe when used with 170-180V DC. Recently I updated the specification for our tubes and decreased the minimum current from 5mA to 4.5mA. The currents are different for every digit anyway - we need to specify this as well for the customers who build the

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-25 Thread Jeff Walton
From: gregebert Date: 7/25/21 7:41 PM (GMT-06:00) To: neonixie-l Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's What really amazed me about the R|Z568m tubes is that even though at 50mm tall,  they are  only 10mm taller than an IN-18, their size is enormous

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-25 Thread gregebert
What really amazed me about the R|Z568m tubes is that even though at 50mm tall, they are only 10mm taller than an IN-18, their size is enormous by comparison. They are "fatter" than an IN-18 so they have better overall proportions, whereas the IN-18 is more tall-and-skinny. On Sunday, July

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-25 Thread MichaelB
i could not agree with you more! On Sunday, July 25, 2021 at 4:55:13 PM UTC-7 nickja...@gmail.com wrote: > But they are beautiful! > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021, 11:48 AM gregebert wrote: > >> Just to be safe, I suggest you measure the voltage drop across the anode >> resistor, and use Ohm's law

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-25 Thread Nick Andrews
But they are beautiful! On Sun, Jul 25, 2021, 11:48 AM gregebert wrote: > Just to be safe, I suggest you measure the voltage drop across the anode > resistor, and use Ohm's law to compute the current. For an 8.2K anode > resistor, and a current of 6mA, the voltage-drop should be around 50V. If

[neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-25 Thread MichaelB
I chose this value based on what I believe is the value Dalibor recommends for his tubes. And they perform well within spec. I have had a PV clock running these same tubes for over 2 years with this value anode resistor and have had no issues such as the phenomena mentioned.. Both clock power

[neonixie-l] Re: NixiSat driving Dalibor's R|568's

2021-07-25 Thread gregebert
Just to be safe, I suggest you measure the voltage drop across the anode resistor, and use Ohm's law to compute the current. For an 8.2K anode resistor, and a current of 6mA, the voltage-drop should be around 50V. If the voltage is below 40 volts, your anode current is too low because it's