hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6921610: 1.6 update 17 and 18 throw java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException

2010-08-18 Thread weijun . wang
Changeset: 95bb147c7c33 Author:weijun Date: 2010-08-19 12:24 +0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/95bb147c7c33 6921610: 1.6 update 17 and 18 throw java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException Reviewed-by: vinnie, xuelei ! src/share/classes/com/sun/jndi/ldap/Connection.java

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6976536: Solaris JREs do not have the krb5.kdc.bad.policy configured by default.

2010-08-18 Thread weijun . wang
Changeset: 4abd65f04638 Author:weijun Date: 2010-08-19 11:26 +0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/4abd65f04638 6976536: Solaris JREs do not have the krb5.kdc.bad.policy configured by default. Reviewed-by: valeriep ! src/share/lib/security/java.security-solaris ! sr

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2010-08-18 Thread kelly . ohair
Changeset: 01dec49e95c4 Author:ohair Date: 2010-08-18 13:46 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/01dec49e95c4 6974005: Use of cygpath in Makefile logic needs to silence error messages Reviewed-by: mchung ! make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk Changeset: 42bfa43f2ae

Re: Code Review 6965924: java.net.HttpCookie using static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe

2010-08-18 Thread gustav trede
On 18 August 2010 13:22, Michael McMahon wrote: > gustav trede wrote: > >> >> On 18 August 2010 12:10, Chris Hegarty > chris.hega...@oracle.com>> wrote: >> >>Michael, >> >>java.net.HttpCookie uses static SimpleDateFormat which is not >>thread safe. I think the best solution here is to

Re: Code Review 6965924: java.net.HttpCookie using static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe

2010-08-18 Thread Michael McMahon
gustav trede wrote: On 18 August 2010 12:10, Chris Hegarty > wrote: Michael, java.net.HttpCookie uses static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe. I think the best solution here is to simply create local SimpleDateFormat as needed. We

Re: Code Review 6965924: java.net.HttpCookie using static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe

2010-08-18 Thread gustav trede
On 18 August 2010 12:47, Chris Hegarty wrote: > On 18/08/2010 11:28, gustav trede wrote: > >> >> On 18 August 2010 12:10, Chris Hegarty > > wrote: >> >>Michael, >> >>java.net.HttpCookie uses static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread >>safe. I think t

Re: Code Review 6965924: java.net.HttpCookie using static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe

2010-08-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 18/08/2010 11:28, gustav trede wrote: On 18 August 2010 12:10, Chris Hegarty mailto:chris.hega...@oracle.com>> wrote: Michael, java.net.HttpCookie uses static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe. I think the best solution here is to simply create local SimpleDateFormat

Re: Code Review 6965924: java.net.HttpCookie using static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe

2010-08-18 Thread gustav trede
On 18 August 2010 12:10, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Michael, > > java.net.HttpCookie uses static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe. > I think the best solution here is to simply create local SimpleDateFormat as > needed. > > Webrev: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6965924/webrev.00/w

Code Review 6965924: java.net.HttpCookie using static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe

2010-08-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
Michael, java.net.HttpCookie uses static SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe. I think the best solution here is to simply create local SimpleDateFormat as needed. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6965924/webrev.00/webrev/ Thanks, -Chris.