Am 08/02/12 17:27, schrieb Chris Hegarty:
Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if possible
(
Changeset: 8a82e5f9c47f
Author:dmocek
Date: 2012-08-02 18:12 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8a82e5f9c47f
7187876: ClassCastException in TCPTransport.executeAcceptLoop
Reviewed-by: dholmes, smarks
! src/share/classes/sun/rmi/transport/tcp/TCPTransport.java
- Original Message -
> Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
> discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
> proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if
> possible
> (
Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if possible
( handling the synchronization at the Jav
Hi Christian,
Probably best to discuss this on the net-dev@openjdk.java.net list (cc'd).
Two comments from me (I'm not on net-dev):
1. CHECK_NULL does a return so you will be leaving the monitor locked if
you encounter any nulls.
2. Is it simpler to add synchronization at the Java level? (I
Changeset: b0bfa441d70f
Author:mullan
Date: 2012-08-02 10:40 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/b0bfa441d70f
7026347: Certificate and X509CRL should have verify(PublicKey key, Provider
sigProvider)
Reviewed-by: mullan, xuelei, weijun
Contributed-by: jason...@orac
