Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

2013-02-22 Thread Joe Darcy
Hi Martin, On 2/22/2013 1:40 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: Hi Joe, On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Joe Darcy > wrote: Should third-party vendor extensions that are "supported" for public use by the third-party use jdk.Supported? No; as I envision it

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

2013-02-22 Thread Martin Buchholz
Hi Joe, On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Joe Darcy wrote: > > Should third-party vendor extensions that are "supported" for public use > by the third-party use jdk.Supported? > > > No; as I envision it, the jdk.Supported annotation is only meant to convey > supported-ness in the JDK of parts o

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

2013-02-22 Thread Joe Darcy
Hi Martin, On 2/22/2013 6:06 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Joe Darcy > wrote: However, the com.sun.* subpackages are a mix of APIs that are supported as described above as well as APIs that are not supported. I was under t

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8008708: Regression: separate compilation causes crash in wildcards inference logic

2013-02-22 Thread maurizio . cimadamore
Changeset: 94e67bed460d Author:mcimadamore Date: 2013-02-22 18:19 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/94e67bed460d 8008708: Regression: separate compilation causes crash in wildcards inference logic Summary: Invalid use of WildcardType.bound in Types.removeW

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2013-02-22 Thread lance . andersen
Changeset: 9f9dac5a9e74 Author:lancea Date: 2013-02-22 09:29 -0500 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9f9dac5a9e74 8008716: address typo in CallableStatement javadocs Reviewed-by: chegar ! src/share/classes/java/sql/CallableStatement.java Changeset: 8d8a35ac7d40 Autho

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

2013-02-22 Thread Alan Bateman
On 22/02/2013 14:06, Martin Buchholz wrote: I was under the impression that the general rule was that all of com.sun.* fell under the "jdk supported" umbrella, and the level of support was the distinction between sun.com.* and sun.* . com.sun is a mixed bag. There are lots of com.sun.*.inter

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

2013-02-22 Thread Sean Mullan
The security related ones look ok to me. --Sean On 02/21/2013 01:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to identify JDK-specific APIs. I'd like to add this to a number of APIs in the com.sun namespace to make it obvious these are "supported"

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8008290: (profiles) Startup regression due to additional checking of JAR file manifests

2013-02-22 Thread alan . bateman
Changeset: 63fe6a9820b6 Author:alanb Date: 2013-02-22 14:04 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/63fe6a9820b6 8008290: (profiles) Startup regression due to additional checking of JAR file manifests Reviewed-by: lancea, chegar, iris, mchung, sherman ! src/share/cla

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

2013-02-22 Thread Martin Buchholz
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Joe Darcy wrote: > > However, the com.sun.* subpackages are a mix of APIs that are supported as > described above as well as APIs that are not supported. I was under the impression that the general rule was that all of com.sun.* fell under the "jdk supported" um

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8008337: Write test to check for compiler error when static method in interface is called via super()

2013-02-22 Thread maurizio . cimadamore
Changeset: 8e82e4f225e4 Author:mcimadamore Date: 2013-02-22 13:31 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/8e82e4f225e4 8008337: Write test to check for compiler error when static method in interface is called via super() Reviewed-by: mcimadamore Contributed-by:

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8006182: cleanup to use java.util.Base64 in java security component, providers, and regression tests

2013-02-22 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 9078c34437ab Author:msheppar Date: 2013-02-21 20:01 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9078c34437ab 8006182: cleanup to use java.util.Base64 in java security component, providers, and regression tests Summary: Refactored code to use java.util.Base64 Mi

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

2013-02-22 Thread Chris Hegarty
Thank you Alan, this will clear up a lot of issues surrounding these API's. I skimmed over the changes, paying particular attention to the httpserver and sctp packages. -Chris. On 02/21/2013 06:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to ide