Re: RFR 4906983: java.net.URL constructors throw MalformedURLException in undocumented way

2015-09-14 Thread Sebastian Sickelmann
Am 14.09.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > On 13/09/15 19:03, Mark Sheppard wrote: >> >> I was thinking as a change for all constructors, as there are URL, which >> may overload authority part's structural elements such that port >> might be >> a "remote object id", or some other form of toke

Re: WebSocket client API

2015-09-14 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
Decided to take a stab at a list of "requirements"... What do people want from a WebSocket client? First, the baseline requirements: (If you don't provide 100% of this list you have a inadequate implementation): Initiate a connection - simple connect (URI) - advanced connect (HttpClien

Re: RFR 4906983: java.net.URL constructors throw MalformedURLException in undocumented way

2015-09-14 Thread Chris Hegarty
> On 14 Sep 2015, at 16:45, Sebastian Sickelmann > wrote: > > Am 14.09.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Chris Hegarty: >> On 13/09/15 20:18, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: >>> Am 13.09.2015 um 16:25 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > On 13 Sep 2015, at 14:07, Mark Sheppard > <

Re: RFR 4906983: java.net.URL constructors throw MalformedURLException in undocumented way

2015-09-14 Thread Sebastian Sickelmann
Am 14.09.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > On 13/09/15 20:18, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: >> Am 13.09.2015 um 16:25 schrieb Chris Hegarty: >>> On 13 Sep 2015, at 14:07, Mark Sheppard <[email protected]> wrote: Hi I don't think

Re: RFR 4906983: java.net.URL constructors throw MalformedURLException in undocumented way

2015-09-14 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 13/09/15 19:03, Mark Sheppard wrote: I was thinking as a change for all constructors, as there are URL, which may overload authority part's structural elements such that port might be a "remote object id", or some other form of token. On 13/09/15 14:07, Mark Sheppard wrote: > a more genera

Re: RFR 4906983: java.net.URL constructors throw MalformedURLException in undocumented way

2015-09-14 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 13/09/15 20:18, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: Am 13.09.2015 um 16:25 schrieb Chris Hegarty: On 13 Sep 2015, at 14:07, Mark Sheppard <[email protected]> wrote: Hi I don't think the URL string http://server:-1/path can be considered a valid URL as the