+1
On 5/6/2016 1:04 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 5 May 2016, at 12:29, Michael McMahon wrote:
Another occasional test case failure. It's a concurrent modification exception
caused
by modifying a list during processing of the list (by the same thread). The
solution
is to keep separate lists
On 5 May 2016, at 12:29, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Another occasional test case failure. It's a concurrent modification
> exception caused
> by modifying a list during processing of the list (by the same thread). The
> solution
> is to keep separate lists of the modifications and to process them
> On 6 May 2016, at 09:16, Felix Yang wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
> several comments:
>
> 1. WebSocket.request(long n) is documented as "
>
> @throws IllegalArgumentException if n < -1
> "
>
> It looks meaningless to allow 0.
First of all, the way `request` is defined now is by no means meanin
Hi Pavel,
several comments:
1. WebSocket.request(long n) is documented as "
@throws IllegalArgumentException if n < -1
"
It looks meaningless to allow 0.
2. Some concern on the way of handling close. Consider following scenario.
* obtain a ws connection
* message communications bala
