Chris, Martin,
thanks for the feedback I'll remove the initialization from the
constructor
regards
Mark
On 07/03/2017 15:17, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Mark,
On 6 Mar 2017, at 23:21, Mark Sheppard wrote:
tha's true from the Java side. I didn't exhaustively
Mark,
> On 6 Mar 2017, at 23:21, Mark Sheppard wrote:
>
> tha's true from the Java side. I didn't exhaustively check if is possible
> that the bindings could
> be returned uninitialized or null from native code - I don't think it is
> possible, but I added the
> null