Hi Daniel,
As far as I see you are right.
Attach to address with empty hostname will try to connect to "external"
address instead of loopback.
--alex
On 04/01/2019 02:51, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Arthur,
Not directly related to Alex's original question but...
On 30/03/2019 00:03, Arthur Euba
There are a bunch of tests with "-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true", which
should clearly fail in an IPv6 only environment.
Would skipping these when IPv4 is not supported be okay? I see that some
tests with "-Djava.net.preferIPv6Addresses=true" will pass even if the IPv6
part of the test failed.
O
On 04/01/2019 05:02, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 01/04/2019 12:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
...
Specifically on SocketTransportService.java. What Arthur has
proposed is better ( changing to lastIndexOf alone is not
sufficient ). Or is your assumption that the IPv6 literal is
not enclosed in square b
Hi Chris,
On 04/01/2019 04:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Alex,
On 29/03/2019 22:07, Alex Menkov wrote:
(added net-dev as suggested by Alan)
Net gurus, please assist in reviewing socket-related code.
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/IPv6/webrev.01/
Specifically on SocketTransportS
Hi Daniel, Chris,
Unfortunately docs are out-dated (I plan to update it in JDK13).
In JDK9
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041435
changed the behavior - empty address (i.e. only port is specified) means
"local connections only", "*" means "all available connections".
Then in JDK10 new
Sorry for never having had the time to finish
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179037
Improve IPv6 support
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:12 AM Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Arthur, others,
>
> In order to help track the all the IPv6 related work, we have the
> following issues:
>
> Improved IPv6 Su
Sounds good, thanks.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:11 AM Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Arthur, others,
>
> In order to help track the all the IPv6 related work, we have the
> following issues:
>
> Improved IPv6 Support ( for implementation issues )
>https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221681
>
> U
On 01/04/2019 10:51, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Arthur,
Not directly related to Alex's original question but...
On 30/03/2019 00:03, Arthur Eubanks wrote:
We have some ipv6 patches as well in this area as well (as well as
other patches to support ipv6 only environments) that we're trying to
ups
Arthur, others,
In order to help track the all the IPv6 related work, we have the
following issues:
Improved IPv6 Support ( for implementation issues )
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221681
Update JDK networking tests for IPv6-only environments ( test-only )
https://bugs.openjdk.
On 01/04/2019 12:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
...
Specifically on SocketTransportService.java. What Arthur has
proposed is better ( changing to lastIndexOf alone is not
sufficient ). Or is your assumption that the IPv6 literal is
not enclosed in square brackets?
More specifically, what syntax ar
Alex,
On 29/03/2019 22:07, Alex Menkov wrote:
(added net-dev as suggested by Alan)
Net gurus, please assist in reviewing socket-related code.
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/IPv6/webrev.01/
Specifically on SocketTransportService.java. What Arthur has
proposed is better ( chan
Hi Arthur,
Not directly related to Alex's original question but...
On 30/03/2019 00:03, Arthur Eubanks wrote:
We have some ipv6 patches as well in this area as well (as well as other
patches to support ipv6 only environments) that we're trying to
upstream. I don't understand the code myself, b
12 matches
Mail list logo
