Re: RFR: JDK-8184770: JDWP support for IPv6

2019-04-23 Thread Alex Menkov
Hi Serguei, updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/IPv6/webrev.04/ Fixed everything except #7 (for consistency - in the file if function arguments spread on several lines, opening curly bracket is placed to separate line to separate function declaration from the function body).

Re: [ipv6] Re: [RFR]: 8222562: IPv6 only systems fail on setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)

2019-04-23 Thread Alan Bateman
On 23/04/2019 16:54, Arthur Eubanks wrote: I believe that `DONT_ENABLE_IPV4`is not strictly required. Maybe just drop it?  Is it an initial attempt to support an IPv6-only JDK build? If so, then maybe we separate out that requirement. It was in the IPv6 code right below so I just

[ipv6] On updating certificates in tests

2019-04-23 Thread Pavel Rappo
Arthur, Some time ago Chris mentioned [1] that there was at least one test failing due to missing SANs in its certificates: test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/https/HttpsURLConnection/IPAddressIPIdentities.java You then replied that your were planning to address that issue in a future change. I

Re: [ipv6] Re: [RFR]: 8222562: IPv6 only systems fail on setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)

2019-04-23 Thread Chris Hegarty
Arthur, On 23/04/2019 11:20, Chris Hegarty wrote: Arthur, On 22/04/2019 19:19, Arthur Eubanks wrote: Here's a new webrev that entirely skips the setting of IPV6_V6ONLY option to 0 if IPv4 isn't enabled. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeubanks/ipv6setsockopt/webrev.01/index.html This looks rea

[ipv6] Re: [RFR]: 8222562: IPv6 only systems fail on setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)

2019-04-23 Thread Chris Hegarty
Arthur, On 22/04/2019 19:19, Arthur Eubanks wrote: Here's a new webrev that entirely skips the setting of IPV6_V6ONLY option to 0 if IPv4 isn't enabled. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeubanks/ipv6setsockopt/webrev.01/index.html This looks reasonable to me. -Chris.