Re: [ipv6] Re: [RFR]: 8222562: IPv6 only systems fail on setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)

2019-04-24 Thread Arthur Eubanks
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:03 AM mark sheppard wrote: > an observation on IPv4_supported and IPV6_supported for your consideration > > > > both, IPv4_support and IPv6_support use socket creation in the > appropriate AF domain as a > a verification of support, but the v6 version also checks that

Re: [ipv6] Re: [RFR]: 8222562: IPv6 only systems fail on setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)

2019-04-24 Thread mark sheppard
an observation on IPv4_supported and IPV6_supported for your consideration both, IPv4_support and IPv6_support use socket creation in the appropriate AF domain as a a verification of support, but the v6 version also checks that there is a set of address binding or ipv6 address configuration

Re: [ipv6] Re: [RFR]: 8222562: IPv6 only systems fail on setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Arthur, The jdk.changeset file in your webrev looks completely wrong. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeubanks/ipv6setsockopt/webrev.02/jdk.changeset I assume it's just garbage and we should ignore it. Can you confirm? WRT to the individual files changes listed at

Re: [ipv6] Re: [RFR]: 8222562: IPv6 only systems fail on setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)

2019-04-24 Thread Chris Hegarty
Arthur, > On 23 Apr 2019, at 16:54, Arthur Eubanks wrote: > > ... > New webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeubanks/ipv6setsockopt/webrev.02/index.html > Looks good to me. -Chris.