On 24/06/2019 21:57, Rob Spoor wrote:
I found a bug in Inet6Adress.isIPv4CompatibleAddress(). While parsing
correctly uses the ::: format, isIPv4CompatibleAddress()
checks for :: instead.
The notion "IPv4-compatible IPv6 address" is different to "IPv4-mapped
IPv6 address". I think the RFCs
Hi Rob,
sending this over to net-dev, where it should be discussed...
/Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: core-libs-dev On Behalf
> Of Rob Spoor
> Sent: Montag, 24. Juni 2019 22:58
> To: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [BUG] Inet6Address.isIPv4CompatibleAddress uses wrong
On 24/06/2019, 11:31, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi Mark
On 23/06/2019, 13:53, mark sheppard wrote:
:
Since the socket is receiving something unexpected, I think I agree
that binding
to the multicast address could be worth doing as well. That would
filter out
packets that perhaps broadcast o
Hello,
Please review the following change:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8226602/webrev.00/
This change adds reactive streams conformance testing of convenience primitives
exposed by java.net.http.HttpClient. The TckDriver.java file from the webrev
provides some explanation on the gener
Hi Daniel,
On 21/06/2019, 17:54, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for doing that. IT should make this test much more stable.
On 21/06/2019 17:27, Michael McMahon wrote:
There is a nio test, java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/Promiscuous.java
that follows a similar pattern. Should it be u
Hi Mark
On 23/06/2019, 13:53, mark sheppard wrote:
Hi Michael, Chris,
a brief note on the possibility of stray packets.
For the test to receive data from external sources it would be
necessary that the senders are
using the same port ( as well as the mcast address) as your test
(which
