On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:04:26 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
>> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which
>> does not require any buffer having one within.
>>
>> Other cases are related to
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:12:34 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
>> Hi @turbanoff, I'm happy to sponsor but I see two comments by @marschall -
>> have they been addressed?
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/1853#discussion_r572815422
>>
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:01:20 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
>> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which
>> does not require any buffer having one within.
>>
>> Other cases are related to
> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which does
> not require any buffer having one within.
>
> Other cases are related to reading either a byte or short `byte[]`: in both
> cases
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:04:49 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix error message
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/net/www/http/HttpClient.java line 434:
>
>> 432:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:29:45 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is an adaptation of a patch originally written by Shafi Ahmad in
>> a comment on the JBS page but never submitted or merged.
>>
>> With -Xcheck:jni, the method java.net.NetworkInterface.getAll very
>> quickly breaches the default JNI
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:59:24 GMT, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> This is an adaptation of a patch originally written by Shafi Ahmad in
>> a comment on the JBS page but never submitted or merged.
>>
>> With -Xcheck:jni, the method java.net.NetworkInterface.getAll very
>> quickly breaches the default
> This is an adaptation of a patch originally written by Shafi Ahmad in
> a comment on the JBS page but never submitted or merged.
>
> With -Xcheck:jni, the method java.net.NetworkInterface.getAll very
> quickly breaches the default JNI local refs threshold (32). Exactly when
> this happens
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:53:11 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Jonathan Dowland has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
>> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show
>> differences compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
>
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:19:19 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
>> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which
>> does not require any buffer having one within.
>>
>> Other cases are related to
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:21:25 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The fix for the reported bug in Utils.CONTEXT_RESTRICTED caused a couple of
>> regression failures, which turned out to be another bug exposed by this fix
>> where HTTP/1.1 CONNECT requests with authentication were filtering
> 8080272 Refactor I/O stream copying to use
> InputStream.transferTo/readAllBytes and Files.copy
Andrey Turbanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8080272 Refactor I/O stream copying to use
InputStream.transferTo/readAllBytes
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:19:19 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
>> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which
>> does not require any buffer having one within.
>>
>> Other cases are related to
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 21:04:59 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The fix for the reported bug in Utils.CONTEXT_RESTRICTED caused a couple of
> regression failures, which turned out to be another bug exposed by this fix
> where HTTP/1.1 CONNECT requests with authentication were filtering out
> This is an adaptation of a patch originally written by Shafi Ahmad in
> a comment on the JBS page but never submitted or merged.
>
> With -Xcheck:jni, the method java.net.NetworkInterface.getAll very
> quickly breaches the default JNI local refs threshold (32). Exactly when
> this happens
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:53:16 GMT, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> This is an adaptation of a patch originally written by Shafi Ahmad in
>> a comment on the JBS page but never submitted or merged.
>>
>> With -Xcheck:jni, the method java.net.NetworkInterface.getAll very
>> quickly breaches the default
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:12:34 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
>> Hi @turbanoff, I'm happy to sponsor but I see two comments by @marschall -
>> have they been addressed?
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/1853#discussion_r572815422
>>
Hi,
Thanks for your review!
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 12:32:07PM +, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I think this looks okay. I assume the deletion of the locals refs at
> the end of createNetworkInterface aren't really needed, but harmless.
For the case where the JNI entrypoint is
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:41:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Done
>
>> Done
>
> I think I'd prefer if the exception message would say that the JMOD is
> invalid or that the JMOD file is truncated (because I don't think anyone
> seeing this exception will know anything about the header).
Fixed
> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which does
> not require any buffer having one within.
>
> Other cases are related to reading either a byte or short `byte[]`: in both
> cases
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 19:32:11 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
> Done
I think I'd prefer if the exception message would say that the JMOD is invalid
or that the JMOD file is truncated (because I don't think anyone seeing this
exception will know anything about the header).
-
PR:
> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which does
> not require any buffer having one within.
>
> Other cases are related to reading either a byte or short `byte[]`: in both
> cases
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 22:48:18 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use InputStream.readNBytes() and fix JLinkNegativeTest
>
>
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:26:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Looks like it's never specified in JavaDoc which particular implementation
>> of List is used in fields of affected classes, so it's quite odd to me that
>> someone would rely on that when using reflection. But your point about
>>
24 matches
Mail list logo
