The code change refactors classes that have a `SuppressWarnings("removal")`
annotation that covers more than 50KB of code. The big annotation is often
quite faraway from the actual deprecated API usage it is suppressing, and with
the annotation covering too big a portion it's easy to call other
On Wed, 19 May 2021 13:47:53 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Please review this implementation of [JEP
>> 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411).
>>
>> The code change is divided into 3 commits. Please review them one by one.
>>
>> 1.
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/576161d15423f58281e38
Hi!
I've recently released an HTTP cache
(https://mizosoft.github.io/methanol/caching) that operates as part of
an interceptor chain built atop a standard HttpClient.
Currently, the cache can store only one response per request. However,
request headers can specify multiple response variants if no
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:30:58 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which in many cases
> can be avoided.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 9425d3de
Author:Sergey Tsypanov
Committer: Claes Redestad
URL:
https://git
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:38:03 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which in many cases
>> can be avoided.
>
> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8261880: Remove s
On Thu, 20 May 2021 10:42:49 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8261880: Remove static from declarations of Holder nested classes
>
> Marked as reviewed by redestad (Reviewer).
@
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:38:03 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which in many cases
>> can be avoided.
>
> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8261880: Remove s
On Tue, 18 May 2021 09:34:25 GMT, Julia Boes wrote:
> The filter operation `Consumer` that is passed to the factory methods can
> throw an unchecked exception. This change adds a note on the exception
> handling in that case. It also adds a clarification to `Filter::afterHandler`
> on the rela
On Thu, 20 May 2021 04:22:32 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> That is unfortunate, but nonetheless I think required to be done.
>> We have acknowledeged this can't reasonably be called an RFE, so the JEP is
>> introducing bugs/technical debt/call it what you will. This should generally
>> be part of a
