On Thu, 27 May 2021 00:41:25 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
>>> if sctp is configured on a linux system would there exist a /proc/net/sctp
>>> and have an entry in /proc/net/protocols ?
>>
>> No /proc/net/sctp and no entry in /proc/net/protocols.
>> But I don't think it's the reason since it passed on anot
On Thu, 27 May 2021 00:41:25 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
>>> if sctp is configured on a linux system would there exist a /proc/net/sctp
>>> and have an entry in /proc/net/protocols ?
>>
>> No /proc/net/sctp and no entry in /proc/net/protocols.
>> But I don't think it's the reason since it passed on anot
On Wed, 26 May 2021 03:54:14 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> java/net/SctpSanity.java fails on some of our test machines due to Protocol
> not supported.
> The reason is that the test fails to detect all the cases when a machine
> doesn't support SCTP.
>
> The fix just follows what are done
Hi,
Please find below a fix for:
8265367: [macos-aarch64] 3 java/net/httpclient/websocket tests fail with
"IOException: No buffer space available"
The Pending* websocket tests create a server that accepts sockets to create a
websocket, but never read data from the websocket in order to get the
> Hi,
>
> Please find below a fix for:
> 8265367: [macos-aarch64] 3 java/net/httpclient/websocket tests fail with
> "IOException: No buffer space available"
>
> The Pending* websocket tests create a server that accepts sockets to create a
> websocket, but never read data from the websocket in o
On Mon, 24 May 2021 13:53:34 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Please review this implementation of [JEP
>> 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411).
>>
>> The code change is divided into 3 commits. Please review them one by one.
>>
>> 1.
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/576161d15423f58281e38
On Fri, 21 May 2021 20:37:30 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> The code change refactors classes that have a `SuppressWarnings("removal")`
>> annotation that covers more than 50KB of code. The big annotation is often
>> quite faraway from the actual deprecated API usage it is suppressing, and
>> with
> Please review this implementation of [JEP
> 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411).
>
> The code change is divided into 3 commits. Please review them one by one.
>
> 1.
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/576161d15423f58281e384174d28c9f9be7941a1
> The essential change for this JEP, incl
On Thu, 27 May 2021 20:16:25 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Please review this implementation of [JEP
>> 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411).
>>
>> The code change is divided into 3 commits. Please review them one by one.
>>
>> 1.
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/576161d15423f58281e38
On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:42:56 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> update FtpClient.java
>
> src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Component.java line 630:
>
>> 628: }
>> 629:
>>
On Fri, 28 May 2021 02:50:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Component.java line 630:
>>
>>> 628: }
>>> 629:
>>> 630: @SuppressWarnings("removal")
>>
>> I'm confused. I thought the reason this wasn't done in the JEP
>> implementation PR is be
On Fri, 28 May 2021 03:12:35 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> There *is* a tiny refactoring here: a new variable `s2` is introduced so the
>> 2nd `doPrivileged` call on line 636 is now also in a declaration statement
>> (for `s2`) and therefore annotatable. Without this I cannot add the
>> annotation
12 matches
Mail list logo
