On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:08:54 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is the continuation of JDK-8233884 and JDK-8271456. This change affects
> fewer cases so I fix all "java." modules at once.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("U
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:18:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> It would be useful to get up to date performance data on using Charset vs.
> charset name. At least historically, the charset name versions were faster
> (see [JDK-6764325](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6764325)).
The code in q
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:08:54 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is the continuation of JDK-8233884 and JDK-8271456. This change affects
> fewer cases so I fix all "java." modules at once.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("U
