On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:45:43 GMT, Mahendra Chhipa
wrote:
>> test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/http/B6296310.java line 103:
>>
>>> 101: try(PrintWriter pw = new
>>> PrintWriter(trans.getResponseBody())) {
>>> 102: pw.print("");
>>> 103: }
>>
>> Not sure what the purpo
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:41:06 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
> The following fix proposes to remove usages of `"impl.prefix"` JDK system
> property from the `java.net.InetAddress` class.
> This system property is used to locate concrete implementations of the
> package private "java.net.InetAddress
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4`
> runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than
> LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that blow
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:41:06 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
> The following fix proposes to remove usages of `"impl.prefix"` JDK system
> property from the `java.net.InetAddress` class.
> This system property is used to locate concrete implementations of the
> package private "java.net.InetAddress
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4`
> runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than
> LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that blow
The following fix proposes to remove usages of `"impl.prefix"` JDK system
property from the `java.net.InetAddress` class.
This system property is used to locate concrete implementations of the package
private "java.net.InetAddressImpl" interface.
The list of changes:
- `impl.prefix` usages ar
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:05:21 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Ok, thanks. @AlanBateman, want to ack?
I don't have anything to add except to say that close and async close
implementations in the SCTP classes needs to be re-written and brought into
line with the implementation in NIO. Also I'm not
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4`
> runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than
> LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that blow
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:54:52 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Mahendra Chhipa has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional
>>
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:02:05 GMT, Julia Boes wrote:
>> This change implements a simple web server that can be run on the
>> command-line with `java -m jdk.httpserver`.
>>
>> This is facilitated by adding an entry point for the `jdk.httpserver`
>> module, an implementation class whose main meth
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:05:34 GMT, Mahendra Chhipa
wrote:
>> Dependencies of TestHttpServre, HttpTransaction, HttpCallback are removed
>> from following tests:
>> open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/http/ResponseCacheStream.java
>> open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/http/SetChunkedStreamingMode.j
> This change implements a simple web server that can be run on the
> command-line with `java -m jdk.httpserver`.
>
> This is facilitated by adding an entry point for the `jdk.httpserver` module,
> an implementation class whose main method is run when the above command is
> executed. This is th
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4`
> runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than
> LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that blow
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:30:21 GMT, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> * For all interfaces use "-b 0.0.0.0" (IPv4) or "-b ::" (IPv6)
>
> Instead of:
>
> * For 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces) use -b 0.0.0.0 or -b ::0
>
> In the usage?
>
> (I think ?::? is canon?)
Good point, "::" is recommended, e.g. in RFC59
14 matches
Mail list logo
