On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:10:11 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This change adds Channel Binding Token (CBT) support to HTTPS
> (java.net.HttpsURLConnection) when used with the Negotiate (SPNEGO, Kerberos)
> authentication scheme. When enabled, the implementation preemptively includes
> a
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:55:18 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Rollback to use captialized S
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 727:
>
>>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:26:46 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> As there is increasing number of SSL parameters, applications may just use
>> the constructor with no argument, and use the set methods individually.
>
> Ok. You should specify what the default value of the signature schemes
> parameter
> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280494
Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:58:55 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This change adds Channel Binding Token (CBT) support to HTTPS
>> (java.net.HttpsURLConnection) when used with the Negotiate (SPNEGO,
>> Kerberos) authentication scheme. When enabled, the implementation
>> preemptively
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 05:26:33 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 94:
>>
>>> 92:
>>> 93: /**
>>> 94: * Constructs SSLParameters.
>>
>> Would it be useful to add another ctor that takes a signature schemes array
>>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 20:24:47 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
>> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
>> RFE:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:37:38 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> In the JSSE specification, the reference to "Java Security Standard Algorithm
> Names" specification is documented as "Java Cryptography Architecture
> Standard Algorithm Name Documentation". As should be corrected.
This pull
> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280494
Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 20:05:45 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> > > Please capitalize "specification" (i.e. "Specification") to be consistent
> > > with other references in the javadoc. Looks good otherwise.
> >
> >
> > OK. Just curious, why we want to use capitalized "specification"? This word
> >
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 19:19:28 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> > Please capitalize "specification" (i.e. "Specification") to be consistent
> > with other references in the javadoc. Looks good otherwise.
>
> OK. Just curious, why we want to use capitalized "specification"? This word
>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:39:34 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please capitalize "specification" (i.e. "Specification") to be consistent
> with other references in the javadoc. Looks good otherwise.
OK. Just curious, why we want to use capitalized "specification"? This word
"specification" is not a
> In the JSSE specification, the reference to "Java Security Standard Algorithm
> Names" specification is documented as "Java Cryptography Architecture
> Standard Algorithm Name Documentation". As should be corrected.
Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
In the JSSE specification, the reference to "Java Security Standard Algorithm
Names" specification is documented as "Java Cryptography Architecture Standard
Algorithm Name Documentation". As should be corrected.
-
Commit messages:
- 8280949: Correct the references for the Java
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 03:08:22 GMT, Bernd wrote:
>> Yes, it does. Do you like to use a for-loop, without new object allocation?
>
> Yes, static helper
Thanks for confirm. Updated to use a static helper method.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7252
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:35:10 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> All this Handler's are stateless and there is nothing to protect via
> synchronization.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: c6ed2046
Author:Andrey Turbanov
URL:
16 matches
Mail list logo
