On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:30:21 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
>> extended socket option
>> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
>> and IPv6
>> UDP sockets (NIO
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
> extended socket option
> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
> and IPv6
> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels). For IPv4 in particular, it sets the DF
> (Dont Fragment) bit
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:25:09 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> These changes make sure that pending requests are terminated if the selector
> manager thread exits due to exceptions.
> This includes:
>1. completing CompletableFutures that were returned to the caller code
>2. cancelling requests
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 11:06:21 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> These changes make sure that pending requests are terminated if the selector
>> manager thread exits due to exceptions.
>> This includes:
>>1. completing CompletableFutures that were returned to the caller code
>>2. cancelling
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 11:06:21 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> These changes make sure that pending requests are terminated if the selector
>> manager thread exits due to exceptions.
>> This includes:
>>1. completing CompletableFutures that were returned to the caller code
>>2. cancelling
Hi,
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285240
contains the release note for the TLS Channel binding enhancement in JDK
19 added in:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8279842
(PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/7065)
The release note uses the explanatory text from the CSR
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
> extended socket option
> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
> and IPv6
> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels). For IPv4 in particular, it sets the DF
> (Dont Fragment) bit
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:07:29 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> I'm not sure there is value in testing all of these permutations.
>> Distinguishing DatagramChannel and DatagramSocket probably made sense, but
>> it's all the same implementation under the hood.
>
> 1. `DatagramChannel.open()` => opens
