On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 at 21:03, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> > On 4 Jun 2018, at 03:48, James Roper wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +1 on variants of getContentType that give you either the media type or
> the charset parsed from the content type header. Without them
text/plain, or application/xml,
in order to parse that correctly, you'll need to do things like
.matches("text/plain(?;.*)?"). Whereas, if you had a getMediaType() you
could just do a .equals("text/plain").
--
*James Roper*
*Senior Developer, Office of the CTO*
Lightbend <http
ny such resources for
> learning/tinkering?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Simon Roberts
> (303) 249 3613
>
>
--
*James Roper*
*Senior Octonaut*
Lightbend <https://www.lightbend.com/> – Build reactive apps!
Twitter: @jroper <https://twitter.com/jroper>
> base? I do believe it would help a lot of people out there.
>
> Based on my understanding, once I have signed the OCA, I should simply
> write an email to the group and request a sponsor to pick up this issue.
> Could someone help me with this?
>
> Thank you,
> Peter
>
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> Simone Bordet
> ---
> Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are,
> to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability,
> the implementation technique must be flawless. Victoria Livschitz
>
--
*James Roper*
*Senior Octonaut*
Lightbend <https://www.lightbend.com/> – Build reactive apps!
Twitter: @jroper <https://twitter.com/jroper>
evelopers will have an option where the answers are guaranteed
>>>> to be yes without the developer having to do any mapping themselves, and
>>>> the lines of code to do that will be one.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, if one has a higher-level library that work
n be found on the
> > networking groups page.
> > http://openjdk.java.net/groups/net/httpclient/
>
>
> -Chris.
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197565
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199938
--
*James Roper*
*Senior Octonaut*
Lightbend <https://www.lightbend.com/> – Build reactive apps!
Twitter: @jroper <https://twitter.com/jroper>
sher)`
>
> ,so it is currently possible to use the `PATCH` method.
>
> Is `PATCH` sufficiently popular to warrant its own self-named
> method in the request builder?
>
> -Chris.
>
--
*James Roper*
*Senior Octonaut*
Lightbend <https://www.lightbend.com/> – Build reactive apps!
Twitter: @jroper <https://twitter.com/jroper>
y on what web browsers
> (which is the target application developer experience that >WebSockets were
> designed for) support as being high level, and what the WebSocket protocol
> allows beyond this as low level.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> James
>>
>>
&g
, very precise error semantics etc, and such a use case would
be well served by the current low level API.
Regards,
James
On 26 February 2018 at 22:15, Simone Bordet <simone.bor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> James,
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:37 AM, James Roper <ja...@li
t; why we should create one more of them. Would you rather have something
>> low-level, you could then implement your high-level API that is most
>> relevant to
>> your case?
>>
>
> You can see the reactive WebSocket API facade (abstracting different
> clie
to verify it.
On 20 February 2018 at 08:41, Simone Bordet <simone.bor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> James (hi! :)
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:55 AM, James Roper <ja...@lightbend.com> wrote:
> > The question for me then is whether there is value in introducing an
> >
e best client/server communication in the process. If
> necessary, create two implementations: WebSocketFast and
> WebSocketSlow.
>
> I'll go back to my cave now and pout about what has happened to my
> once fabulous WebSocket.
>
--
*James Roper*
*Senior Octonaut*
Lightbend <https://www.lightbend.com/> – Build reactive apps!
Twitter: @jroper <https://twitter.com/jroper>
difficult if
not impossible.
Regards,
James
On 12 February 2018 at 16:33, Pavel Rappo <pavel.ra...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Thanks for the comprehensive reply to Chuck's email. Now regarding your
> own email.
>
> > On 10 Feb 2018, at 07:38, James Roper
On 12 February 2018 at 18:56, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com>
wrote:
> James,
>
> On 10/02/18 07:38, James Roper wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> https://developer.lightbend.com/blog/2018-02-06-reactive-str
>> eams-ee4j/index.html
>>
>
> Regardi
ndly ask you to provide an example of an application that is possible to
> implement in a non-back-pressured model and is not possible in the proposed
> WebSocket API.
>
> Thanks,
> -Pavel
>
> ---
> [1] https://github.com/rea
l and whole
> messages. The jdk8 implementation decoders/encoders accumulate
> messages and assemble them until the message is complete and then pass
> it to the Endpoint -- much more satisfactory arrangement.
>
> I cannot fathom the meaning or improvement of this new wrinkle.
>
> Th
,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look at this, and sending your thoughts.
>
> On 08/12/17 00:30, James Roper wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion about the use of Flow.Subscriber and
> > Flow.Publisher in JEP 321 (HTTP Client API).
> &
to
decide on that, it's something that we should keep in mind.
Regards,
James
--
*James Roper*
*Senior Octonaut*
Lightbend <https://www.lightbend.com/> – Build reactive apps!
Twitter: @jroper <https://twitter.com/jroper>
19 matches
Mail list logo
